Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 4, 2025

Casiano v. The City of New York

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:25-cv-05720
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
9
Civil RightsSection 1983Pro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Anthony Casiano v. The City of New York, Judge Furman ordered service steps and identification of unnamed officers in Casiano’s civil-rights case.

Who this affects

Anthony Casiano; the City of New York; Officer Nicholas C. Pascucci, Shield # 9214; six currently unidentified New York City Police Department officers; and the New York City Law Department and Police Department, which must take the actions described in the order.

What happened

Anthony Casiano v. The City of New York is a civil-rights lawsuit in which Casiano, without a lawyer, alleges that the defendants violated his federal constitutional and state-law rights.

The court had already allowed Casiano to proceed without paying court fees. Because the complaint identified six unnamed New York City police officers involved in his arrest, the court directed the New York City Law Department to identify them and provide their badge numbers and service addresses.

Judge Furman requested that the City and Officer Nicholas C. Pascucci waive formal service of the summons. He also required Casiano to file an amended complaint naming the unidentified officers after receiving the information; the order did not decide whether Casiano’s claims were valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Casiano v. The City of New York · No. 1:25-cv-05720
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Sept. 4, 2025

Background

Anthony Casiano is proceeding without a lawyer and brings claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law that allows claims against state or local officials for violating federal rights. He alleges that the defendants violated his federal constitutional rights and his rights under state law. The opinion does not describe the underlying events in detail. An earlier order dated August 8, 2025, allowed Casiano to proceed without paying court fees in advance.

Service of the lawsuit

The court directed the Clerk of Court to electronically notify the New York City Police Department and the New York City Law Department of the order. The court requested that the City of New York and Officer Nicholas C. Pascucci, Shield # 9214, waive service of the summons. The order also directs the Clerk to mail Casiano an information package.

Identifying the unnamed officers

Casiano’s complaint names six New York City Police Department officers as John or Jane Doe defendants and provides enough information for the City to identify them. Under the procedure described in the opinion, the New York City Law Department must determine each officer’s identity, badge number, and address for service, then provide that information to Casiano and the court within 60 days of the order.

Within 30 days after receiving the information, Casiano must file an amended complaint naming the previously unidentified officers. The amended complaint will replace the original complaint rather than supplement it. After Casiano files it, the court will screen the amended complaint and, if necessary, issue an order asking the newly identified defendants to waive service.

Disposition

This is an order addressing service and identification of defendants. Judge Furman did not decide the merits of Casiano’s constitutional or state-law claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 9-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.