Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 17, 2024

Jolly v. FurtherEd, Inc.

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:24-cv-06401
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Jolly v. FurtherEd, Inc., Judge Liman consolidated two actions and appointed interim co-lead class counsel.

Who this affects

The order affects plaintiffs Kamilah Jolly and Diego Alvarez-Miranda Ezpeleta, the proposed class, FurtherEd, Inc. d/b/a Lawline, and the appointed interim co-lead class counsel.

What happened

In Jolly v. FurtherEd, Inc., plaintiffs Kamilah Jolly and Diego Alvarez-Miranda Ezpeleta asked the court to combine their actions because they involved common legal and factual questions. The motion was unopposed.

The court consolidated the actions under docket number 1:24-cv-06401-LJL and directed the Clerk to close docket number 1:24-cv-06709-LJL. It also ordered that future filings be made under the consolidated action’s docket number.

Judge Liman appointed Matthew J. Langley and Arun Ravindran as interim co-lead class counsel. The order did not decide whether a class should be certified or resolve the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jolly v. FurtherEd, Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-06401
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
Oct. 17, 2024

Background

Two putative class actions were pending against FurtherEd, Inc., doing business as Lawline. The plaintiffs were Kamilah Jolly and Diego Alvarez-Miranda Ezpeleta. They moved to consolidate the actions and to appoint Matthew J. Langley of Almeida Law Group LLC and Arun Ravindran of Hedin LLP as interim co-lead class counsel. The motion was unopposed.

Consolidation

The court applied Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a), which permits consolidation of actions involving common questions of law or fact. The court found that the two actions involved common legal and factual questions. Considering convenience, expedition, and judicial economy, the court consolidated the actions into a single case under docket number 1:24-cv-06401-LJL. The Clerk was directed to close docket number 1:24-cv-06709-LJL and file the order in both case files. Counsel were directed to make filings only under the consolidated-action docket number.

Interim Class Counsel

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(g)(3) permits a court to designate interim counsel for a proposed class before deciding whether to certify the action as a class action. The court recognized the attorneys’ agreement to serve as co-counsel and their qualifications, experience, and firms’ sophistication in this area of law. It concluded that the proposed class’s interests would be best served by the joint appointment.

Ruling

The motion to appoint Matthew J. Langley and Arun Ravindran as interim co-lead class counsel was granted. The court also consolidated the two actions. The order did not address class certification or the merits of the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.