Tirado v. Commissioner of Social Security
- James Oetken
- 1:21-cv-06793
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Tirado v. Commissioner of Social Security, Judge Oetken dismissed the case with prejudice after a fully favorable agency decision following remand.
Ivis Tirado and the Commissioner of Social Security; the case was dismissed with prejudice after the administrative proceedings produced a fully favorable decision for Tirado.
What happened
In Tirado v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court had previously sent Ivis Tirado’s case back to the Social Security Commissioner for further proceedings. The court kept authority over the case while those proceedings occurred.
The proceedings ended with a January 4, 2024 decision that was fully favorable to Tirado. The opinion does not provide further details about that decision.
Judge James Oetken dismissed the action with prejudice and directed the Clerk to enter judgment.
The detailed version
- Tirado v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:21-cv-06793
- James Oetken
- Nov. 26, 2024
Background
The court had remanded, or sent back, the case to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings on January 20, 2022. The court retained jurisdiction under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), meaning it kept authority to address the case after the additional agency proceedings.
Those proceedings resulted in a January 4, 2024 decision that was fully favorable to Plaintiff Ivis Tirado. The opinion does not state the specific relief or findings in that decision.
Disposition
The court ordered that the action be dismissed with prejudice. It directed the Clerk to enter judgment and cited Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.