Malone v. O'Malley
- James Oetken
- 1:24-cv-07341
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Malone v. O'Malley, Judge Oetken granted Malone’s motion and remanded his Social Security case for further proceedings.
Travis J. Malone and the Social Security Commissioner; the case was remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings.
What happened
Travis J. Malone asked the court to review the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of his claim for Supplemental Security Income in Malone v. O'Malley.
A magistrate judge recommended granting Malone’s request for judgment on the pleadings and sending the case back to the Commissioner for further proceedings. No party timely objected to that recommendation.
Judge Oetken found no clear error, adopted the recommendation, granted Malone’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, and remanded the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The clerk was directed to close the case.
The detailed version
- Malone v. O'Malley · No. 1:24-cv-07341
- James Oetken
- Aug. 26, 2025
Background
Travis J. Malone filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), which permits judicial review of a Social Security benefits decision. He challenged the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of his claim for Supplemental Security Income. The court referred the case to Magistrate Judge Henry J. Ricardo for a report and recommendation concerning any motion for judgment on the pleadings, a motion asking the court to decide the case based on the parties’ written submissions.
Report and Recommendation
Malone moved for judgment on the pleadings. Judge Ricardo issued a report and recommendation advising the court to grant the motion and remand the case to the Social Security Commissioner for further proceedings. Neither party filed a timely objection. Because there were no timely objections, Judge Oetken reviewed the recommendation for clear error—an obvious mistake on the face of the record.
Ruling
Judge Oetken found no clear error and fully adopted Judge Ricardo’s report and recommendation. Under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the court granted Malone’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and remanded the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The clerk was directed to close the case.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.