Adams v. County of San Mateo
- Jeffrey White
- 4:24-cv-06289
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 1
In Adams v. County of San Mateo, Judge White dismissed the case with prejudice after Adams failed to amend his civil-rights complaint.
The dismissal ends Ezra O. Adams’s case against the County of San Mateo and the other defendants named in the caption.
What happened
Ezra O. Adams sued the County of San Mateo and other defendants in a civil-rights complaint. The court had previously dismissed the complaint for failing to present a legally valid claim and gave Adams until November 13, 2024, to file an amended complaint.
Adams did not file an amended complaint, ask for more time, or explain why he had not done so. The court therefore dismissed the case with prejudice, meaning the case cannot be refiled in the same form based on this dismissal.
Judge Jeffrey White ordered the dismissal with prejudice and directed the Clerk to enter judgment and close the file.
The detailed version
- Adams v. County of San Mateo · No. 4:24-cv-06289
- Jeffrey White
- Dec. 2, 2024
Background
The court stated that it had dismissed Adams’s civil-rights complaint on October 15, 2024, because the complaint did not present a cognizable claim for relief. The court gave Adams until November 13, 2024, to file an amended complaint and warned that the case would be dismissed if he did not do so.
What the Court Decided
Adams did not file an amended complaint, request an extension of time, or show cause—provide a reason—to explain why he had not complied. The court dismissed the case with prejudice. It also directed the Clerk to enter judgment and close the file.
Classification
This is a procedural order because the court dismissed the case after Adams failed to amend his complaint as ordered; this order did not decide the underlying civil-rights claims on their merits.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.