Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 4, 2024

Regal Games LLC v. SellerX Eight GmbH

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:24-cv-04337
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureIntellectual Property
In one sentence

In Regal Games LLC v. SellerX Eight GmbH, Judge Broderick ordered a service-efforts letter and warned that failure could lead to dismissal.

Who this affects

Regal Games LLC and the four SellerX defendants: SellerX Eight GmbH, SellerX Fourteen GmbH, SellerX Eighteen GmbH, and SellerX Germany GmbH.

What happened

In Regal Games LLC v. SellerX Eight GmbH, Regal Games sued four SellerX companies over trademark infringement and unfair competition. Regal Games previously dismissed its claims against Walmart Inc.

The court explained that the usual 90-day deadline for serving defendants does not apply to service in a foreign country, but that an exemption may not apply if service was never attempted during that period. The court ordered Regal Games to report its service efforts.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick ordered Regal Games to submit a letter by December 13, 2024, describing its efforts to serve the SellerX defendants. If Regal Games had not tried to serve them within 90 days after the summonses issued, it had to explain why there was good cause not to dismiss the case; failure to submit the letter or show good cause would result in dismissal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Regal Games LLC v. SellerX Eight GmbH · No. 1:24-cv-04337
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Dec. 4, 2024

Background

Regal Games LLC filed claims for trademark infringement and unfair competition against SellerX Eight GmbH, SellerX Fourteen GmbH, SellerX Eighteen GmbH, and SellerX Germany GmbH. Regal Games also sued Walmart Inc., but voluntarily dismissed its claims against Walmart on August 16, 2024.

The Clerk of Court issued summonses for the four SellerX defendants on September 4, 2024. The court noted that the defendants are German corporations and that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m)'s usual 90-day service deadline does not apply to service in a foreign country. The court also explained, based on Second Circuit authority, that this exemption may not apply if service was never attempted within the statutory period.

Order

The court ordered Regal Games to submit, no later than December 13, 2024, a letter of no more than three pages describing its efforts to serve the SellerX defendants. If Regal Games did not attempt service within the 90 days after the summonses were issued, it had to show good cause—an adequate legal reason—for why the action should not be dismissed for failure to serve the defendants.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick warned that failure to submit the required letter and, if necessary, demonstrate good cause would result in dismissal of the action. The order did not decide the trademark-infringement or unfair-competition claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.