Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 27, 2025

Sadowski v. Tribuna Abierta, Inc.

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:23-cv-00337
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Intellectual PropertyCivil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Sadowski v. Tribuna Abierta, Judge Broderick adopted the damages report, awarding $7,200 plus interest and $3,647.52 in fees and costs.

Who this affects

Christopher Sadowski received an order adopting the recommended damages, interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs against Tribuna Abierta, Inc.; the Clerk was directed to enter judgment and close the case.

What happened

In Sadowski v. Tribuna Abierta, Inc., Christopher Sadowski, a photojournalist, sued Tribuna Abierta, Inc. for using his copyrighted photograph without authorization. The case involved one copyright-infringement claim.

Tribuna Abierta did not respond. The court entered a default judgment against it on liability, meaning the defendant’s failure to respond resulted in judgment on responsibility for the infringement. Magistrate Judge Robert H. Lehrburger later recommended damages and related payments.

No party objected to the recommendation. Judge Vernon S. Broderick found no clear error, adopted the recommendation in full, and directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment and close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sadowski v. Tribuna Abierta, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-00337
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Feb. 27, 2025

Background

Christopher Sadowski, a photojournalist, brought a single copyright-infringement claim against Tribuna Abierta, Inc. He alleged that the defendant used his copyrighted photograph without authorization. Sadowski filed the action on January 13, 2023.

Tribuna Abierta failed to respond. On Sadowski’s motion, Judge Vernon S. Broderick entered a default judgment against the defendant as to liability on August 30, 2023. The court then referred the issue of damages to Magistrate Judge Robert H. Lehrburger for an inquest, meaning a proceeding to determine the amount owed after liability had been established.

Report and Recommendation

On April 16, 2024, Judge Lehrburger recommended that the court award Sadowski $7,200 in statutory damages, prejudgment interest at the rate specified in 28 U.S.C. § 1961 beginning when the action was filed, and $3,647.52 in attorneys’ fees and costs.

The report gave the parties 14 days to file objections and warned that failing to object would waive the right to object and prevent appellate review. Sadowski submitted proof that the report had been served on Tribuna Abierta. Neither party filed an objection or requested additional time.

Ruling

Judge Broderick reviewed the report for clear error, the standard used when no timely objection is filed, and found none. He adopted Judge Lehrburger’s Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The Clerk of Court was directed to enter judgment in accordance with the order and close the case.

The order therefore adopted the recommended award of $7,200 in statutory damages, the specified prejudgment interest, and $3,647.52 in attorneys’ fees and costs. The opinion classifies this as a default-judgment disposition rather than a decision reached through an adversarial determination of the copyright claim’s merits.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.