Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 4, 2024

Zheng v. Mayorkas

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:24-cv-08999
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
ImmigrationCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Zheng v. Mayorkas, Judge Liman ordered U.S. Marshals Service assistance serving defendants after Lun Zheng was allowed to proceed without paying filing fees.

Who this affects

Lun Zheng and the defendants Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, and Andrea Quarantillo; the order also directs actions by the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

In Zheng v. Mayorkas, Lun Zheng, representing himself, brought a case seeking a court order and a declaration, and the complaint could also be understood as seeking relief under the Administrative Procedure Act. The court had already allowed him to proceed without paying filing fees upfront.

Because Zheng was proceeding without paying those fees, the court directed the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to help serve Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, and Andrea Quarantillo. The court extended the service period to 90 days after summonses are issued and stated that Zheng should request more time if service is not completed within that period.

Judge Lewis J. Liman issued an order of service directing the Clerk to issue summonses, complete the required service forms, and provide the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Zheng v. Mayorkas · No. 1:24-cv-08999
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
Dec. 4, 2024

Background

Lun Zheng, who is representing himself, sued Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, and Andrea Quarantillo. The complaint seeks a writ of mandamus, meaning a court order directing official action, and declaratory relief. The court stated that the complaint could also be understood as seeking relief under the Administrative Procedure Act. In an order dated December 3, 2024, the court allowed Zheng to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning without paying filing fees upfront.

Service of Process

Because Zheng was allowed to proceed without prepaying filing fees, the court stated that he was entitled to assistance from the court and the U.S. Marshals Service in serving the defendants. The court directed the Clerk of Court to prepare a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, mark the form for service on the United States, issue summonses, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to complete service.

The court explained that although service generally must occur within 90 days after a complaint is filed, Zheng could not have completed service until the court reviewed the complaint and ordered summonses. It therefore extended the service period to 90 days after the summonses are issued. If service is not completed within that period, the order states that Zheng should request an extension of time. Zheng must also notify the court in writing if his address changes; the court stated that it may dismiss the action if he fails to do so.

Disposition

Judge Lewis J. Liman issued an order of service. The Clerk was instructed to issue summonses for Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, and Andrea Quarantillo, complete the required service forms with their addresses, deliver the necessary documents to the U.S. Marshals Service, and mail an information package to Zheng. The opinion does not resolve the merits of Zheng's mandamus, declaratory-relief, or Administrative Procedure Act claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.