Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 19, 2024

Riley v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-09638
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
Civil ProcedurePro SeFee Petition
In one sentence

In Riley v. Otis Bantum, Judge Swain ordered Dwayne M. Riley to pay fees or submit forms within 30 days before proceeding.

Who this affects

Dwayne M. Riley and the progress of his civil action against Otis Bantum Correctional Center and the other named defendants. Riley must either pay the required fees or submit the specified forms within 30 days to avoid dismissal.

What happened

Dwayne M. Riley v. Otis Bantum Correctional Center concerns Riley’s civil action filed without the required fees or paperwork to proceed without paying fees upfront. The opinion states that Riley is incarcerated and representing himself.

The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $405 in filing and administrative fees or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees and a prisoner authorization. If approved, the filing fee would be collected in installments from Riley’s prison account.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered Riley, within 30 days, to pay the fees or submit the required forms. The court directed that no summons issue yet and stated that the action will be dismissed if Riley does not comply. It also denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Riley v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility · No. 1:24-cv-09638
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Dec. 19, 2024

Background

Dwayne M. Riley filed a civil action against Otis Bantum Correctional Center and other defendants. The opinion states that Riley is incarcerated at Otis Bantum Correctional Facility and is representing himself.

Riley submitted his complaint without paying the filing fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees, commonly called an IFP application, or a prisoner authorization. The court explained that filing a civil action ordinarily requires payment of a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee, for a total of $405.

For a prisoner seeking to proceed without prepaying fees, federal law requires an IFP application and a prisoner authorization. The authorization directs the correctional facility to deduct the $350 filing fee from the prisoner’s account in installments and to provide certified account statements for the previous six months. The $55 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted IFP status.

Court’s action

The court ordered Riley to do one of two things within 30 days of the order: pay the $405 in fees, or submit the attached IFP application and prisoner authorization. The opinion instructs that those forms should be labeled with docket number 24-CV-9603, although the order’s caption identifies the case as No. 24-CV-9638 (LTS).

The court stated that no summons would issue at that time. If Riley complies with the order, the Clerk’s Office will process the case under its procedures. If he does not comply within the permitted time, the action will be dismissed.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. The order did not decide the underlying claims against the defendants.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.