Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 10, 2025

Prado v. Prado-Moore

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-00629
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro SeFee Petition
In one sentence

In Prado v. Prado-Moore, Judge Swain ordered payment or a fee-waiver application within 30 days, warning of dismissal if Yolanda Prado did neither.

Who this affects

Yolanda Prado must either pay the $405 in fees or submit a signed IFP application within 30 days; otherwise, the action will be dismissed.

What happened

In Prado v. Prado-Moore, Yolanda Prado filed a civil case without paying the required fees or submitting an application to proceed without paying them upfront.

The court ordered Prado to pay $405 or submit a signed fee-waiver application within 30 days. No summons will issue yet, and the action will be dismissed if she does not comply.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-waiver status for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Prado v. Prado-Moore · No. 1:25-cv-00629
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Feb. 10, 2025

Background

Yolanda Prado filed this civil action without a lawyer. She submitted the complaint without paying the required filing fees and without an application to proceed without prepaying fees, known as an IFP application.

Order

The court ordered Prado, within 30 days of the order, to either pay $405 in fees or submit a signed IFP application. The $405 consists of a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee. If the court grants the IFP application, Prado may proceed without paying the fees upfront.

The court ordered that no summons issue at this time. If Prado complies, the case will be processed under the Clerk’s Office’s procedures. If she does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed.

Appeal-related ruling

The court certified that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal.

Result

This order addressed payment of filing fees and the fee-waiver application; it did not decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.