Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 19, 2024

Khalifa v. Willoughby

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:24-cv-09559
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureCivil Rights
In one sentence

In Khalifa v. Willoughby, Judge Furman ordered Khalifa to amend jurisdiction allegations or face dismissal without prejudice.

Who this affects

Moamen Khalifa must amend the complaint to establish federal subject-matter jurisdiction; the defendants are affected because the case may be dismissed without prejudice if he cannot do so.

What happened

In Khalifa v. Willoughby, Moamen Khalifa claimed federal jurisdiction based on the parties’ citizenship and an amount in dispute exceeding $75,000. The complaint did not state Vasyl Slipenchuk’s citizenship and gave only a general allegation about the amount at stake.

The court ordered Khalifa to amend the complaint by January 6, 2025, to address both problems. The complaint seeks damages and legal fees but does not explain the value of the claim.

Judge Jesse M. Furman warned that if Khalifa cannot establish the court’s authority over the case, the complaint will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Khalifa v. Willoughby · No. 1:24-cv-09559
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Dec. 19, 2024

Background

Moamen Khalifa’s complaint asserted subject-matter jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship. Diversity jurisdiction generally requires complete diversity among the parties and an amount in controversy exceeding $75,000.

Jurisdictional deficiencies

The court identified two problems with the complaint’s jurisdictional allegations. First, the complaint did not allege Defendant Vasyl Slipenchuk’s citizenship. Second, it stated only conclusorily that the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000. Although Khalifa requested compensatory damages, punitive damages, and reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses, the complaint did not state the value of the claim or facts supporting the jurisdictional amount.

Order

The court ordered Khalifa to amend the complaint by January 6, 2025, to remedy these deficiencies. The court did not dismiss the complaint at this stage. It stated that if Khalifa is unable to amend the complaint to establish subject-matter jurisdiction, the complaint will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice to any party.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.