Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 12, 2024

McKenzie v. The City of Mount Vernon

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:18-cv-00603
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
25
Civil ProcedureTort
In one sentence

In McKenzie v. The City of Mount Vernon, Judge Briccetti recommended $9.625 million after default, including compensatory and punitive damages for Shamoya McKenzie’s conscious pain and suffering.

Who this affects

The recommendation directly concerns Nadine McKenzie, individually and as administratrix of Shamoya McKenzie’s estate, and the defaulting defendants David Hardy, Marquis Collier, Jermaine Hughley, and Sincere Savoy. It recommends compensatory and punitive damages against those four defendants, while recommending no damages for the wrongful-death or assault-and-battery claims.

What happened

In McKenzie v. The City of Mount Vernon, Nadine McKenzie sought damages for the conscious pain and suffering of her daughter, Shamoya McKenzie, who was shot and killed at age 13. The four individual defendants—David Hardy, Marquis Collier, Jermaine Hughley, and Sincere Savoy—had already defaulted on liability and did not appear at the damages hearing.

The court recommended $1.75 million in compensatory damages against the four defendants together, plus $7.875 million in punitive damages allocated individually: $2.625 million against Hardy and $1.75 million each against Collier, Hughley, and Savoy. The court also recommended post-judgment interest on the total $9.625 million. It recommended no damages for wrongful death and no separate damages for assault and battery.

Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause made the recommendation for Judge Briccetti, who had referred the damages issue for review. The recommendation is subject to the parties’ right to file objections; the opinion does not state that Judge Briccetti had entered a final damages judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
McKenzie v. The City of Mount Vernon · No. 7:18-cv-00603
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
Nov. 12, 2024

Background

Nadine McKenzie brought the case individually, as Shamoya McKenzie’s parent and guardian, and as administratrix of Shamoya’s estate. Shamoya, who was 13 years old, was shot by a bullet while riding in the front passenger seat of her mother’s car in Mount Vernon, New York, on December 31, 2016. The opinion states that David Hardy, Marquis Collier, Jermaine Hughley, and Sincere Savoy each pleaded guilty to federal criminal charges connected to the shooting.

McKenzie settled her claims against the City of Mount Vernon, several City police officers, and Empress Ambulance Services. The four individual defendants later defaulted. Judge Briccetti entered a default judgment against them on liability only, and the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause for an inquest—a hearing to determine damages. The defendants did not appear at that hearing or respond to McKenzie’s submissions.

Evidence of Conscious Pain and Suffering

McKenzie testified that Shamoya cried out for her, bled heavily, gasped for air, and had open, moving eyes after being shot. Medical records showed that Shamoya initially had a pulse and motor and neurological function, but became unresponsive several minutes after the ambulance arrived. The records showed that she was pronounced dead at the hospital later that afternoon.

The court found McKenzie’s testimony highly credible. Based on the testimony and medical records, it concluded that Shamoya remained conscious for approximately 36 to 41 minutes after the shooting. The court considered that period, Shamoya’s injuries, her cries for her mother, and her difficulty breathing and coughing up blood when comparing the case with damages awards in other cases.

Recommended Damages

For conscious pain and suffering, the court recommended $1,750,000 in compensatory damages against Hardy, Collier, Hughley, and Savoy jointly and severally, meaning each defendant could be responsible for the full compensatory amount. It also recommended punitive damages, which are intended to punish especially wrongful conduct and deter similar conduct: $2,625,000 against Hardy and $1,750,000 against each of Collier, Hughley, and Savoy. The punitive damages total $7,875,000, producing a total recommended award of $9,625,000, plus post-judgment interest under federal law.

The court found the defendants’ conduct highly reprehensible because it involved the malicious and violent discharge of a deadly weapon on a city street without regard for the risk to human life. It concluded that the recommended punitive damages were reasonable when compared with the compensatory damages and with punitive awards in other cases.

Claims Receiving No Recommended Damages

The court recommended no damages for wrongful death. It explained that New York wrongful-death damages are limited to financial losses suffered by eligible beneficiaries. The record did not provide enough evidence about Shamoya’s future earnings, the financial circumstances of McKenzie, or any reasonable expectation that Shamoya would have provided financial assistance.

The court also recommended no separate damages for assault and battery because any such damages would duplicate the damages recommended for conscious pain and suffering.

Recommendation and Further Procedure

The document is a Report and Recommendation rather than a final damages judgment. It recommends the $9,625,000 award and post-judgment interest, while declining damages for wrongful death and assault and battery. The parties were given 14 days after service to file objections. The opinion states that untimely objections would waive objections and preclude appellate review.

The authoritative version

Read the full 25-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.