Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 2, 2025

Garan v. 32BJ North Pension Fund

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:24-cv-06964
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Garan v. 32BJ North Pension Fund, Judge Broderick denied Garan’s motion to return the case to state court.

Who this affects

Jozef Garan, whose motion to return the case to state court was denied, and 32BJ North Pension Fund, which removed the case to federal court.

What happened

In Garan v. 32BJ North Pension Fund, the Fund moved the case from New York state court to the Southern District of New York. Jozef Garan asked the federal court to send it back.

A magistrate judge recommended denying Garan’s request. Neither side objected to that recommendation or asked for more time to object.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick reviewed the recommendation for clear error, found none, adopted it in full, and denied Garan’s motion to return the case to state court.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Garan v. 32BJ North Pension Fund · No. 1:24-cv-06964
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Jan. 2, 2025

Background

On September 16, 2024, 32BJ North Pension Fund removed the case from the Supreme Court of the State of New York to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Jozef Garan then moved to remand the case, meaning he asked the federal court to return it to state court.

Report and Recommendation

The court had referred the case to Magistrate Judge Katherine H. Parker. On November 7, 2024, Judge Parker recommended that Garan’s motion to remand be denied. The report explained that the parties could file objections, but neither party objected or requested additional time.

Ruling

Because there were no timely objections, Judge Broderick reviewed the report and recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. He found no clear error, adopted the report and recommendation in its entirety, and denied Garan’s motion to remand. The clerk was directed to mail Garan a copy of the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.