Moroshkin v. National Council on the Aging
- 1:23-cv-01301
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Moroshkin v. National Council on the Aging, the court dismissed all claims with prejudice and denied Moroshkin’s cross-motion as moot; no judge is identified.
Sergei Moroshkin’s claims against all defendants were dismissed with prejudice. Defendant El-Nashar’s and Defendant NCOA’s motions to dismiss were granted, and Moroshkin’s cross-motion was denied as moot.
What happened
In Moroshkin v. National Council on the Aging Senior Community Service Employment Program, the judgment states that the reasons for dismissal appear in the court’s January 6, 2025 Opinion and Order, which is not included here.
The court granted Defendant El-Nashar’s motion to dismiss and Defendant NCOA’s motion to dismiss. As a result, all claims against all defendants were dismissed with prejudice. The court denied Moroshkin’s cross-motion to deny El-Nashar’s motion to dismiss as moot.
The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying appeal fees. The case was closed. The judge is not identified in the provided judgment.
The detailed version
- Moroshkin v. National Council on the Aging · No. 1:23-cv-01301
- Jan. 6, 2025
Rulings
The judgment states that, for the reasons given in the court’s Opinion and Order dated January 6, 2025, Defendant El-Nashar’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 17) and Defendant NCOA’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 38) were granted. The judgment specifies that all claims asserted against all defendants were dismissed with prejudice, meaning the judgment bars those claims from being brought again in the case.
Moroshkin’s cross-motion to deny El-Nashar’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 36) was denied as moot, meaning the court found that motion no longer required a decision after ruling on the dismissal motion.
Appeal and Case Status
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Opinion and Order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to proceed without paying required fees for an appeal. The judgment states that the case was closed.
Information Not Included
The provided text is a judgment and refers to a separate Opinion and Order that is not included. It does not identify the judge or explain the underlying claims or the reasons for dismissal.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.