Martinez v. Segal
- Jeffrey Bryan
- 0:24-cv-04049
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In Martinez v. Segal, Judge Bryan adopted an unchallenged recommendation and dismissed the action without prejudice after finding no clear error.
Jenna L. Martinez’s action against Michael Segal, Warden, was dismissed without prejudice.
What happened
In Martinez v. Segal, the court considered a magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Neither party objected to the recommendation by the deadline.
Because there were no timely objections, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error. It found no clear error in the recommendation.
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan adopted the recommendation and dismissed the action without prejudice on January 8, 2025.
The detailed version
- Martinez v. Segal · No. 0:24-cv-04049
- Jeffrey M. Bryan
- Jan. 8, 2025
Background
The court reviewed a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on November 25, 2024. The recommendation advised dismissing the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The opinion does not state the underlying reason for the recommended dismissal.
Review of the Recommendation
Neither party filed objections, and the deadline for doing so had passed. The court therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake in the recommendation. The court found no clear error.
Ruling
The court adopted the Report and Recommendation and dismissed the action without prejudice. The court also directed that judgment be entered. Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan signed the order on January 8, 2025.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.