Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 8, 2025

Buxbaum v. TD Bank

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:24-cv-09832
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Buxbaum v. TD Bank, Judge Swain ordered Michael Buxbaum to pay $405 or submit an IFP application within 30 days.

Who this affects

Michael Buxbaum and the processing of his action against TD Bank.

What happened

In Buxbaum v. TD Bank, Michael Buxbaum filed the case without paying the required fees or submitting an application to proceed without prepaying them.

The court gave Buxbaum 30 days from January 8, 2025, to pay $405 or submit a signed application to proceed without prepayment. No summons would be issued at that time.

If Buxbaum does not comply, the action will be dismissed; if he does comply, the Clerk’s Office will process the case. Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Buxbaum v. TD Bank · No. 1:24-cv-09832
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
Jan. 8, 2025

Background

Michael Buxbaum brought this action pro se, meaning without a lawyer. He submitted the complaint without paying the required filing fees and without submitting an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or without prepaying court fees.

Order

The court explained that proceeding with a civil action requires either payment of $405—consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee—or a signed application requesting permission to proceed without prepayment. The court ordered Buxbaum, within 30 days of the order, to pay the fees or submit the attached application. The application was to identify docket number 24-CV-9832 (LTS).

No summons would issue at that time. If Buxbaum complied, the Clerk’s Office would process the case under its procedures. If he failed to comply within the allowed period, the action would be dismissed.

Appeal-fee ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

Classification

This is a procedural order addressing payment of filing fees and an application to proceed without prepayment; it does not decide the underlying claims against TD Bank.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.