Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 10, 2025

Cole v. United States Marshals Service

Judge
Paul Magnuson
Docket
0:24-cv-02148
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureSummary Judgment
In one sentence

In Cole v. United States Marshals Service, Judge Magnuson denied without prejudice Cole’s motion for default summary judgment after adopting an unobjected-to recommendation.

Who this affects

Victor Demitrius Cole and the United States Marshals Service

What happened

In Cole v. United States Marshals Service, Victor Demitrius Cole asked the court for default summary judgment against the United States Marshals Service. A magistrate judge recommended denying the motion without prejudice.

Cole did not object to the recommendation before the deadline. Judge Paul A. Magnuson therefore reviewed it for clear error and found none.

Judge Magnuson adopted the recommendation and denied Cole’s motion for default summary judgment without prejudice. The order did not state the underlying reasons for denying the motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cole v. United States Marshals Service · No. 0:24-cv-02148
Judge
Paul Magnuson
Date
Jan. 10, 2025

Background

Victor Demitrius Cole filed a motion for default summary judgment against the United States Marshals Service. The court considered a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty, dated November 21, 2024. The recommendation advised denying Cole’s motion without prejudice, meaning the order did not bar a later filing.

Review of the Recommendation

Cole did not file objections, and the deadline for doing so had passed. Because there were no objections, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error rather than conducting a full new review. The court stated that it found no error, clear or otherwise, in the magistrate judge’s reasoning.

Ruling

Judge Paul A. Magnuson adopted the Report and Recommendation and denied Cole’s Motion for Default Summary Judgment without prejudice. The order did not provide the underlying reasons for the recommended denial beyond stating that the court found no error in the magistrate judge’s reasoning.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.