Rodriguez-Morales v. New York City Police Department
- Laura Swain
- 1:25-cv-00168
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Rodriguez-Morales v. New York City Police Department, Judge Swain ordered payment or a proper fee-waiver application and a signed filing.
Enki Rodriguez-Morales, who must satisfy the court’s fee, signature, and certification requirements for the action to proceed.
What happened
Rodriguez-Morales v. New York City Police Department concerns a self-represented plaintiff whose fee-waiver application and complaint were unsigned.
The court gave the plaintiff 30 days to pay $405 or submit a completed, signed application to proceed without paying the fees upfront. The plaintiff must also sign and submit the required certification and warnings.
Judge Swain directed that no summons or answer issue yet and stated the action will be dismissed without prejudice if the plaintiff does not comply.
The detailed version
- Rodriguez-Morales v. New York City Police Department · No. 1:25-cv-00168
- Laura Swain
- Jan. 10, 2025
Background
Enki Rodriguez-Morales brought the action without a lawyer. The plaintiff submitted an application to proceed without prepaying court fees, commonly called an application to proceed in forma pauperis or IFP, but did not sign it. The complaint was also unsigned.
Court’s directions
The court explained that starting a civil case requires either paying $405 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee—or submitting a completed and signed IFP application. Within 30 days, the plaintiff must do one of those things. If the court grants the IFP application, the plaintiff will not have to prepay the fees.
The plaintiff must also sign and submit the attached “Plaintiff’s Certification and Warnings” within 30 days. The court described acceptable handwritten and electronic-signature options for submissions by mail, in person, or email.
Disposition
The court directed the plaintiff to pay the $405 fee or submit a signed amended IFP application and to submit the signed certification and warnings. No summons or answer will issue at this time. If the plaintiff does not comply within the allowed period, the action will be dismissed without prejudice, meaning the dismissal would not bar refiling. The court also certified that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.