Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 7, 2025

Young v. Doe

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-10069
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

Young v. Doe: Judge Swain transferred the prisoner’s civil-rights case from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York.

Who this affects

Ricky D. Young’s lawsuit against P.O. John Doe, an unidentified Queens Assistant District Attorney, two unidentified police officers, and the City of New York was moved to the Eastern District of New York. The order also affected Young’s ability to appeal without prepaying fees and left his request to proceed without prepaying filing fees for the receiving court to decide.

What happened

Ricky D. Young v. P.O. John Doe, et al. is a lawsuit brought without a lawyer under a federal civil-rights law. Young’s claims concern events at Queens Criminal Court and a hospital in Flushing, New York.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain concluded that the Southern District of New York was not the proper location based on where the events occurred. Queens County is in the Eastern District of New York, where the case could properly proceed, and that district appeared more convenient for witnesses and documents.

Judge Swain ordered the case transferred to the Eastern District of New York. She also directed that no summons issue from the Southern District, closed the case there, and denied fee-free status for any appeal; the receiving court will decide whether Young may continue without paying filing fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Young v. Doe · No. 1:24-cv-10069
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 7, 2025

Background

Ricky D. Young, who is incarcerated at the Eric M. Taylor Center on Rikers Island, filed this action without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law that permits claims against state or local officials for violating federal rights. He sued an unidentified Queens Assistant District Attorney, two unidentified police officers, and the City of New York. He said that his claims arose at the Queens Criminal Court and at a hospital in Flushing.

Venue and Transfer

Venue is the legally proper geographic location for a lawsuit. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1391, a civil action may generally be filed where the defendants reside or where a substantial part of the events occurred. The court found that venue was not proper in the Southern District of New York based on where the events occurred because Young alleged that those events took place in Queens County. The court said it was unclear whether venue was proper there based on the defendants’ residences.

Queens County is in the Eastern District of New York, so venue was proper there based on the location of the events. The court also applied 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), which permits transfer for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. It determined that transfer was appropriate because the underlying events occurred in Queens County and witnesses and relevant documents could reasonably be expected to be there.

Ruling

The court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The Clerk of Court was directed to transfer the action, and the Southern District of New York case was closed. A summons was not to issue from the Southern District. The court left it to the Eastern District to decide whether Young could proceed without prepaying filing fees. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.