Islam v. United States Postal Service
- Laura Swain
- 1:24-cv-10065
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Islam v. United States Postal Service, Judge Swain dismissed a duplicate lawsuit without prejudice to Plaintiff’s pending related case.
The dismissal affects Mohammad T. Islam’s duplicate lawsuit against the United States Postal Service and the other named defendants. His separate pending case under docket number 24-CV-10064 was not dismissed by this order.
What happened
In Islam v. United States Postal Service, Mohammad T. Islam, representing himself, alleged that he experienced discrimination during his 2013 employment at the United States Postal Service. He invoked the court’s federal-question jurisdiction.
Islam filed another substantially similar complaint against the Postal Service and many of the same defendants on the same day. Because this case raised the same claims, the court found that litigating both cases would serve no useful purpose.
Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed this complaint without prejudice to Islam’s pending case under docket number 24-CV-10064. Judge Swain also denied fee-free status for an appeal, certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, and directed the clerk to enter judgment.
The detailed version
- Islam v. United States Postal Service · No. 1:24-cv-10065
- Laura Swain
- Jan. 10, 2025
Background
Mohammad T. Islam, proceeding without a lawyer, brought an action invoking the court’s federal-question jurisdiction. He alleged that he experienced discrimination during his employment at the United States Postal Service in 2013.
Reason for Dismissal
On the same day, Islam filed another substantially similar complaint against the Postal Service and many of the same defendants. The court concluded that this complaint raised the same claims as the other case and that litigating this duplicate lawsuit would serve no useful purpose.
Ruling
The court dismissed the complaint as duplicative, without prejudice to Islam’s pending case under docket number 24-CV-10064. The court directed the clerk to enter judgment in this action.
Appeal and Fee Status
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied Islam fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.