Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 10, 2025

Bey v. Westchester County Police Headquaters

Judge
Cathy Seibel
Docket
7:24-cv-09098
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Bey v. Westchester County Police Headquarters, Judge Swain ordered payment or an application to proceed without prepaying fees.

Who this affects

The order directly affects plaintiffs Zaryub Musa Tariff Bey and Diane Burchette Bey, particularly Tariff Bey because he had not submitted an application to proceed without prepaying fees.

What happened

Bey v. Westchester County Police Headquarters involves plaintiffs Zaryub Musa Tariff Bey and Diane Burchette Bey, who filed the case without paying the required fees. Both plaintiffs are proceeding without lawyers.

The court said the plaintiffs must either pay $405 or have Tariff Bey submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees. Burchette Bey had already submitted such an application, but Tariff Bey had not.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered compliance within 30 days. If the plaintiffs do not pay or Tariff Bey does not submit the application, Tariff Bey’s claims will be dismissed without prejudice, and the case will continue with Burchette Bey as the only plaintiff. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bey v. Westchester County Police Headquaters · No. 7:24-cv-09098
Judge
Cathy Seibel
Date
Jan. 10, 2025

Background

Plaintiffs Zaryub Musa Tariff Bey and Diane Burchette Bey filed this action without lawyers and without paying the required court fees. The court explained that filing a civil action requires either payment of $405—consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee—or a signed application from each plaintiff requesting permission to proceed without prepaying fees. This permission is commonly called proceeding in forma pauperis, or IFP.

Burchette Bey submitted an IFP application, but Tariff Bey did not. The order therefore required the plaintiffs, within 30 days, either to pay the $405 in fees or to have Tariff Bey submit the attached IFP application labeled with the case number.

Order

The court directed payment of the fees or submission of Tariff Bey’s IFP application. No summons or answer was to issue at that time. If the plaintiffs complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If they did not pay the fees and Tariff Bey did not submit an IFP application within the permitted time, the order stated that claims brought on Tariff Bey’s behalf would be dismissed without prejudice, and the action would proceed with Burchette Bey as the sole plaintiff.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.