Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 13, 2025

Jaime v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-04091
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
8
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Luis Jaime v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Judge Swain granted more time to amend the complaint but denied appeal fee-waiver status.

Who this affects

Luis Jaime, whose deadline to file an amended complaint was extended, and the defendants in his case, including the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision.

What happened

Luis Jaime, who is incarcerated and proceeding without a lawyer, asked for permission to file an amended complaint after the court had dismissed his original complaint with 30 days to replead. He also said he was seeking a lawyer and provided some facts.

The court treated Luis Jaime’s filing as a request for more time and granted it. The court ordered him to file an amended complaint, if any, within 30 days of the order. If he did not, the complaint would be dismissed as stated in the earlier order.

Judge Swain also directed that any amended complaint replace the original complaint and stated that appeal-fee-waiver status was denied because an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jaime v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision · No. 1:24-cv-04091
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 13, 2025

Background

Luis Jaime, who was incarcerated at Upstate Correctional Facility and proceeding without a lawyer, had previously filed a complaint. In an order dated November 14, 2024, the court dismissed that complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii), while giving him 30 days to file a new complaint.

On December 2, 2024, Jaime filed a motion for permission to replead. He stated that he was seeking counsel and included facts that he apparently intended to include in an amended complaint.

Ruling

The court construed Jaime’s application, identified as ECF 9, as a request for an extension of time to file an amended complaint and granted the request. The court directed him to file an amended complaint, if any, within 30 days of January 13, 2025.

The court said that the amended complaint should be legibly written or typed and should explain who violated Jaime’s federally protected rights, and how, when, and where the alleged violations occurred. The amended complaint would completely replace, rather than supplement, the original complaint. The court encouraged Jaime to use the attached prisoner amended-complaint form if he continued to proceed without a lawyer.

The court stated that if Jaime did not submit an amended complaint within 30 days, the complaint would be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii), as described in the November 14, 2024 order. The court also certified that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying appeal fees. Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 8-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.