Bierbrauer v. DOC
- Laura Provinzino
- 0:24-cv-03812
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 2
In Bierbrauer v. DOC, Judge Provinzino adopted screening recommendations, dismissing eight defendants without prejudice and Canine Partner with prejudice.
The order dismissed DOC, Henry D. Padelford, Adam C. Kodet, Shane M. Jones, Staci Stone, Bryan F. Dettloff, Livingston, and Chrystal Anderson without prejudice, and dismissed Canine Partner with prejudice. Dennis Zahn remained as the sole defendant.
What happened
Brandon Bierbrauer brought this action against DOC, Zahn & Canine Partner, CCO1, and several individually named defendants. The court reviewed a magistrate judge’s recommendation under the prisoner-complaint screening statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). Neither party objected to the recommendation.
The court dismissed DOC, Henry D. Padelford, Adam C. Kodet, Shane M. Jones, Staci Stone, Bryan F. Dettloff, Livingston, and Chrystal Anderson without prejudice. It dismissed Canine Partner with prejudice. Dennis Zahn was the sole remaining defendant.
Judge Laura M. Provinzino found no clear error, adopted the recommendation in full, and ordered judgment entered accordingly.
The detailed version
- Bierbrauer v. DOC · No. 0:24-cv-03812
- Laura M. Provinzino
- Jan. 22, 2025
Background
The matter concerned a report and recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster, entered December 19, 2024. The recommendation applied the federal prisoner-complaint screening statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). It recommended dismissing Defendant Canine Partner with prejudice and dismissing all defendants other than Dennis Zahn without prejudice.
The opinion states that neither party objected to the report and recommendation. Because there were no objections, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error.
Ruling
The court found no clear error and adopted the report and recommendation in full. It dismissed the following defendants without prejudice from the action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b): DOC, Henry D. Padelford, Adam C. Kodet, Shane M. Jones, Staci Stone, Bryan F. Dettloff, Livingston, and Chrystal Anderson.
The court dismissed Defendant Canine Partner with prejudice under the same statute. The order states that Dennis Zahn was the sole remaining defendant. The court directed that judgment be entered accordingly.
Party-name clarification
The docket lists “Zahn & Canine Partner, CCO” as one party. The court understood “Zahn” in that listing to refer to Defendant Dennis Zahn, who was also separately identified as an individual defendant. The order’s references to “Defendant Canine Partner” refer to “Zahn & Canine Partner” as listed in the docket and do not include Dennis Zahn.
Judge
Judge Laura M. Provinzino entered the order on January 22, 2025.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.