Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 22, 2025

Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-00510
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners, Judge Swain dismissed Lim’s complaint without prejudice at her request and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

The plaintiff’s complaint was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice at her request. The order also denied fee-free status for any appeal and terminated the motion at ECF 3.

What happened

In Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners, the plaintiff asked to withdraw her complaint. The court received her voluntary-dismissal notice on January 15, 2025.

The court granted the request and dismissed the complaint without prejudice, meaning the dismissal did not bar a future filing. The court also ended a pending motion and ruled that the plaintiff could not appeal without paying court fees.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain issued the order on January 22, 2025. She also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners · No. 1:25-cv-00510
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 22, 2025

Background

On January 15, 2025, the court received Khor Chin Lim’s notice stating that she wanted to withdraw her complaint without prejudice.

Ruling

The court granted Lim’s request to withdraw the action. It voluntarily dismissed the complaint without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). The court directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motion listed at ECF 3.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The opinion does not address the merits of the complaint.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.