Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 16, 2025

Henry Scully v. Dr. Hoffman

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-07745
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Tara E. Henry Scully v. Dr. Hoffman, Chief Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice because Plaintiff neither submitted an amended fee-waiver application nor paid filing fees.

Who this affects

Plaintiff's complaint was dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff did not submit the required amended fee-waiver application or pay the filing fee. Plaintiff was also denied fee-waiver status for an appeal.

What happened

In Tara E. Henry Scully v. Dr. Hoffman, the court had ordered Plaintiff to submit an amended application to proceed without paying filing fees or to pay the required fees for the civil case.

The order gave Plaintiff thirty days and warned that failing to comply would lead to dismissal. Plaintiff did not submit the amended application or pay the fees.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice, directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment, and denied fee-waiver status for any appeal after finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Henry Scully v. Dr. Hoffman · No. 1:24-cv-07745
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 16, 2025

Background

The court had previously directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, either to submit an amended application to proceed without paying filing fees—called an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or IFP—or to pay the $405 filing fee required to bring a civil action in the court. The earlier order warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal.

Plaintiff’s Noncompliance

Plaintiff did not file an amended IFP application and did not pay the required fees.

Ruling

The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. “Without prejudice” means the dismissal did not bar refiling, although the opinion does not describe any future filing requirements.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. The court directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.