Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 23, 2025

Fernandez v. Kijakazi

Judge
Thomas Hixson
Docket
3:21-cv-01238
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
4
Social SecurityFee Petition
In one sentence

In Fernandez v. King, Judge Hixson approved $32,136 in Social Security attorney fees and ordered counsel to refund $5,757 previously paid under another fee law.

Who this affects

Elena Fernandez and her attorney, Richard Zieman. The order authorizes payment of $32,136 to Zieman from Fernandez’s past-due benefits and requires him to refund Fernandez $5,757 in previously awarded EAJA fees.

What happened

In Fernandez v. King, Elena Fernandez’s lawyer asked the court to approve $32,136 in attorney fees after the court had sent her benefits case back for further proceedings and she later received benefits.

The Commissioner awarded Fernandez $128,544 in past-due benefits. Her fee agreement allowed her lawyer to receive up to 25% of that award, and the court had separately approved $5,757 in fees under a law requiring the government to pay certain fees.

Judge Thomas S. Hixson granted the attorney-fee motion, directed the Commissioner to certify $32,136 payable to Richard Zieman, and ordered Zieman to refund Fernandez the $5,757 previously awarded under that other law.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Fernandez v. Kijakazi · No. 3:21-cv-01238
Judge
Thomas Hixson
Date
Jan. 23, 2025

Background

Fernandez sought judicial review of the Social Security Commissioner’s decision denying benefits. On April 20, 2022, the court remanded the case for further proceedings. On remand, the Commissioner granted Fernandez’s application and awarded $128,544 in retroactive benefits.

Fernandez’s attorney, Richard Zieman, requested $32,136 under Section 206(b) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). That amount represented 25% of Fernandez’s past-due benefits, consistent with her contingent-fee agreement. The court had previously approved $5,757 in attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, or EAJA.

Court’s analysis

Section 406(b) permits a federal court to award an attorney a reasonable fee for representing a successful Social Security claimant, subject to a limit of 25% of the claimant’s past-due benefits. The court explained that it must first consider the contingent-fee agreement and then independently review whether the requested amount is reasonable.

The court found the request reasonable because Zieman submitted a valid contingent-fee agreement and time records, reported 28.05 hours of work, and obtained a favorable result for Fernandez. The court found no evidence of substandard work or that the fee was disproportionate to the work performed. The resulting effective hourly rate was $1,145.67, which the court found to be within the range approved in other cases.

Ruling

Judge Thomas S. Hixson granted the motion for attorney fees. The Commissioner was directed to certify $32,136 in fees under Section 406(b), payable to Richard Zieman. Because fees awarded under Section 406(b) must account for fees previously paid under the EAJA, Zieman was ordered to refund Fernandez the $5,757 EAJA fee award.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.