Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 23, 2025

Buxbaum v. Falco

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-00598
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Buxbaum v. Falco, Judge Swain ordered Michael Buxbaum to pay fees or submit an application to proceed without prepaying them.

Who this affects

Michael Buxbaum must, within 30 days, either pay the $405 fee or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees. If he does neither or fails to request an extension, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. Louis Falco is not required to answer at this stage.

What happened

Buxbaum v. Falco began when Michael Buxbaum submitted a civil action by email. The court had not yet issued a summons or required an answer from Louis Falco.

The court ordered Buxbaum, within 30 days, either to pay $405 in fees or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying them. No further action would be taken until one of those steps occurred.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain said that if Buxbaum did not comply or request more time, the action would be dismissed without prejudice, meaning it could be filed again. She also denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for any appeal from the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Buxbaum v. Falco · No. 1:25-cv-00598
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 23, 2025

Background

Michael Buxbaum submitted this civil action to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by email. The court assigned the action a docket number but had not issued a summons or required Louis Falco to answer.

Order

The court directed Buxbaum, within 30 days of the order, to do one of two things: pay $405 in fees, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee, or complete, sign, and submit an application to proceed without prepaying fees. The order refers to this application as an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or IFP.

The court stated that no further action would be taken until the fees were paid or a completed and signed IFP application was received. If Buxbaum complied, the Clerk’s Office would process the case. If the court granted the IFP application, Buxbaum could proceed without prepaying the fees.

Disposition

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered that the action would be dismissed without prejudice to refiling if Buxbaum failed to comply within the allowed time or failed to request an extension. The court also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.