Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 17, 2025

Destiny Haughton v. City of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-00366
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Shaday Martinez Destiny Haughton v. City of New York, Judge Swain ordered a pro se plaintiff to file a complaint and provide service information within 30 days.

Who this affects

The order directly affects Shaday Martinez Destiny Haughton by requiring her to file a complaint and provide service information within 30 days. The action may be dismissed if she does not comply; the opinion does not decide the claims against the City of New York or the Department of Homeless Services.

What happened

Shaday Martinez Destiny Haughton sued the City of New York and the New York City Department of Homeless Services, but she filed no complaint. She also applied to proceed without paying filing fees and did not provide a mailing address or agree to receive court documents electronically.

The court directed her to file a complaint and provide a mailing address or consent to electronic service within 30 days of the order. No summons will issue yet, and the court stated that the action will be dismissed if she does not comply within that time.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied free-payment status for any appeal, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. The order does not decide the underlying claims because no complaint had been filed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Destiny Haughton v. City of New York · No. 1:25-cv-00366
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 17, 2025

Background

Shaday Martinez Destiny Haughton brought this action without a lawyer. She submitted an application to proceed without paying the filing fee, but she did not file a complaint. The order explains that a civil action begins when a complaint is filed.

She also did not provide a mailing address or consent to receive court documents electronically. Although her fee-waiver application included an email address, the court treated that as insufficient to establish either a mailing address for service or consent to electronic service.

Court’s directives

The court directed Plaintiff, within 30 days of the order, to do both of the following: (1) file a complaint and (2) provide a mailing address for service or submit consent to electronic service. No summons shall issue at this time. The court stated that the action will be dismissed if Plaintiff does not comply within the allowed period.

The Clerk of Court was directed to email the order to Plaintiff at the email address on file and to provide the order and electronic-service attachment if she appears at the court’s Pro Se Intake window.

Appeal and effect of the order

Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying the filing fee for purposes of an appeal. This order is a procedural order: it sets filing and service requirements and does not decide the merits of any claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.