CourtAlert.com, Inc. v. American LegalNet, Inc.
- Vernon Broderick
- 1:20-cv-07739
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In CourtAlert.com v. American LegalNet, Judge Figueredo ordered parties seeking to keep ECF No. 151 sealed to justify continued secrecy or face unsealing.
The defendants and any parties interested in keeping ECF No. 151 sealed are affected; the documents may be unsealed if the required showing is not made.
What happened
CourtAlert.com, Inc. v. American LegalNet, Inc. concerns documents that the defendants filed under seal at ECF No. 151.
The court directed anyone who wanted the documents to remain sealed to file a sealing motion and explain why continued sealing was justified under the cited legal standard by February 17, 2025. Without that showing, the documents would be unsealed.
Judge Valerie Figueredo, a United States magistrate judge, issued the order on January 27, 2025.
The detailed version
- CourtAlert.com, Inc. v. American LegalNet, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-07739
- Vernon Broderick
- Jan. 27, 2025
Background
The defendants filed the documents listed at ECF No. 151 under seal, meaning the documents were not publicly accessible on the court docket.
Order
The court directed parties interested in keeping the documents sealed to file a motion to seal and make the required showing under Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga by February 17, 2025. The order states that the documents will be unsealed if no such showing is made.
Disposition
The order sets a deadline for seeking continued sealing and does not itself state that the documents were unsealed or that a sealing motion was granted or denied. The order was signed by Valerie Figueredo, United States Magistrate Judge.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.