Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 24, 2025

Cavallo v. HPD Section 8

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-04242
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Cavallo v. HPD Section 8, Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied appeal fee-waiver status because the appeal was not in good faith.

Who this affects

Ronnie Cavallo, the plaintiff, and the defendants in the action were affected by the dismissal; Ronnie Cavallo was also affected by the denial of fee-free appeal status.

What happened

In Cavallo v. HPD Section 8, the court entered a civil judgment dismissing the action for reasons stated in a January 22, 2025, order. The supplied opinion does not describe those reasons.

The court also certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied the plaintiff permission to proceed without paying filing fees for an appeal.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment on January 24, 2025, in the Southern District of New York.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cavallo v. HPD Section 8 · No. 1:24-cv-04242
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 24, 2025

Ruling

The court entered a civil judgment dismissing the action. It stated that the dismissal was based on the reasons explained in its January 22, 2025, order, but that order is not included in the supplied opinion. The available text therefore does not identify the claims, the dismissal grounds, or whether the court addressed the merits.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. As a result, it denied the plaintiff permission to proceed without paying the required fees for an appeal. The judgment cites a Supreme Court decision explaining that good faith exists when an appellant seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue.

Disposition

The action was dismissed. In addition, in forma pauperis status—permission to proceed without paying court fees—was denied for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.