Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 22, 2025

Williams v. B.R.C. of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-05855
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Williams v. BRC of New York, Judge Swain transferred Williams’s action to the Eastern District of New York because the events occurred in Brooklyn.

Who this affects

Clifton Clinton Williams, IV and the defendants in his action are affected because the case was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York. The receiving court will decide whether Williams may proceed without prepaying fees.

What happened

Clifton Clinton Williams, IV, representing himself, sued BRC of New York and others after he allegedly was forced to leave a Brooklyn shelter based on accusations that he had stolen property at another shelter. He is detained at the North Infirmary Command on Rikers Island.

The Southern District of New York transferred the action to the Eastern District of New York because the events occurred in Brooklyn, which is in the Eastern District. The Southern District closed the case, and the receiving court will decide whether Williams may continue without paying filing fees. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal from the transfer order.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the transfer order under the federal law allowing a case to be moved for convenience and fairness. The order did not decide whether Williams’s allegations were true or whether he will win the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Williams v. B.R.C. of New York · No. 1:24-cv-05855
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 22, 2025

Background

Clifton Clinton Williams, IV, who is detained at the North Infirmary Command on Rikers Island, brought the action without a lawyer. He alleged that staff at a BRC shelter at 146 Clay Street in Brooklyn forced him to leave without notice based on false accusations that he had stolen a laptop from an affiliated homeless shelter.

Transfer analysis

The court discussed the federal venue statute, which identifies the districts where a civil case may be filed. It stated that venue did not appear proper in the Southern District under the provision based on where the events occurred because Williams alleged that the events took place outside that district. The court noted that venue might still be proper there based on the defendants’ residence, but Williams had not provided enough facts for the court to make that determination.

The court found that venue was proper in the Eastern District of New York because Brooklyn is located there. It also considered the federal law allowing transfer for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. Because the underlying events occurred in Brooklyn, the court concluded that the Eastern District appeared to be a more convenient forum.

Ruling and effect

The court ordered the Clerk of Court to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The order closed the case in the Southern District of New York, and no summons was to issue from that court. The transferee court will decide whether Williams may proceed without prepaying fees. The court certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The order transferred the case and did not resolve the truth of Williams’s allegations or the merits of his claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.