Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 27, 2025

Rivera v. Otis Bantum Correctional Center

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-09622
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Rivera v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility, Judge Swain dismissed Rivera’s complaint without prejudice after he neither paid fees nor submitted required forms.

Who this affects

Carlos Rivera’s complaint was dismissed without prejudice because he did not pay the filing fees or submit the required forms. The court also denied fee-free status for an appeal. The opinion does not state whether Rivera was represented by a lawyer.

What happened

In Rivera v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility, Carlos Rivera was ordered to submit forms requesting permission to proceed without paying the filing fee and authorizing deductions from a prisoner account, or to pay the required fees. The order warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal.

The court received notice that its order was undeliverable. Rivera did not submit the required forms, pay the fees, or otherwise contact the court.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice, meaning the dismissal did not bar refiling. The court also denied permission to appeal without paying fees and directed the clerk to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rivera v. Otis Bantum Correctional Center · No. 1:24-cv-09622
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 27, 2025

Background

The court’s December 18, 2024 order directed Carlos Rivera, within 30 days, either to submit a completed application to proceed without paying the filing fee and a prisoner authorization form, or to pay the $405 required filing fees. The order stated that failing to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint.

On January 15, 2025, the court received notice from the U.S. Postal Service that the December 18 order could not be delivered. Rivera had not submitted the application or prisoner authorization, paid the fees, or otherwise communicated with the court. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

Ruling

The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying fees. The clerk was directed to enter judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.