Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 27, 2025

Corraro v. Otis Bantum Correctional Center

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-09604
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Corraro v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility: Chief Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice after Corraro did not pay fees or submit required forms.

Who this affects

Raimy Corraro's complaint was dismissed without prejudice. The defendants named in the complaint were affected by the dismissal, but the court did not decide the underlying claims.

What happened

In Corraro v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility, the court ordered Corraro to submit an application to proceed without paying filing fees, provide required prisoner authorization, or pay the $405 filing fees. The order warned that failing to do so would lead to dismissal.

The court received notice that its earlier order could not be delivered. Corraro did not submit the required forms, pay the fees, or otherwise contact the court.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice. She also denied permission to appeal without paying fees and directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Corraro v. Otis Bantum Correctional Center · No. 1:24-cv-09604
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 27, 2025

Background

On December 17, 2024, the court ordered Corraro to submit a completed application to proceed without paying filing fees and a prisoner authorization, or to pay the $405 in fees required to file a civil action. The order stated that failing to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint.

On January 21, 2025, the court received notice from the U.S. Postal Service that the December 17 order was undeliverable. Corraro had not filed the required application or authorization, paid the fees, or otherwise communicated with the court.

Ruling

The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. It also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying fees. The court directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.

Effect of the Ruling

The opinion states that the complaint was dismissed without prejudice. It does not decide the underlying claims against the defendants. The opinion also does not state whether Corraro was represented by a lawyer.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.