Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 29, 2025

Trustees of the District Council No.9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees of the District Council No.9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund v. Sunlab Contractors Inc.

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:25-cv-00764
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Trustees v. Sunlab Contractors, Judge Torres set deadlines for confirming an arbitration award and required personal service.

Who this affects

The petitioners and Sunlab Contractors Inc.; the order sets their filing, service, and response deadlines in the petition to confirm an arbitration award.

What happened

Trustees of the District Council No.9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund and the other petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award against Sunlab Contractors Inc.

The order treated the petition like a request for summary judgment and set deadlines for the petitioners’ supporting materials, Sunlab’s opposition, and the petitioners’ reply.

Judge Analisa Torres also required the petitioners to personally serve Sunlab with the petition and order, then file proof of service; the order did not decide whether to confirm the award.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees of the District Council No.9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund v… · No. 1:25-cv-00764
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Jan. 29, 2025

Background

The petitioners—the Trustees of the District Council No.9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund, the Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Annuity Fund, and the District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A-F.L.-C.LO.—filed a petition on January 27, 2025, asking the court to confirm an arbitration award against Sunlab Contractors Inc.

Order

The court stated that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated like a motion for summary judgment. It ordered the petitioners to file and serve a statement under Local Civil Rule 56.1 and supporting materials by March 4, 2025. Sunlab was required to file opposition papers by March 25, 2025, and the petitioners could file a reply by April 8, 2025.

The court also ordered the petitioners to personally serve Sunlab with the petition and the order by February 14, 2025, and to file an affidavit proving service by February 18, 2025. Judge Analisa Torres did not decide whether the arbitration award should be confirmed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.