Inovalon Provider, Inc. v. LabQ Clinical Diagnostics, LLC
- Analisa Torres
- 1:25-cv-02671
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
Inovalon Provider v. LabQ Clinical Diagnostics, Judge Torres ordered briefing and service for a petition to confirm an arbitration award.
Inovalon Provider, Inc. must meet the filing, service, and proof-of-service deadlines. LabQ Clinical Diagnostics, LLC must respond by filing any opposition by May 16, 2025.
What happened
Inovalon Provider, Inc. asked the court to confirm an arbitration award against LabQ Clinical Diagnostics, LLC. The order did not decide whether the award should be confirmed.
The court required Inovalon Provider to file a Local Civil Rule 56.1 statement and supporting materials by April 25, 2025. LabQ’s opposition was due May 16, and Inovalon Provider’s reply, if any, was due May 23. Inovalon Provider also had to personally serve LabQ and the New York secretary of state by April 9 and file proof of service by April 11.
Judge Analisa Torres set these filing and service requirements. The case remained pending, with the petition to be considered using procedures similar to a motion for summary judgment.
The detailed version
- Inovalon Provider, Inc. v. LabQ Clinical Diagnostics, LLC · No. 1:25-cv-02671
- Analisa Torres
- Apr. 4, 2025
Background
Inovalon Provider, Inc., identified in the caption as formerly known as Ability Network Inc., filed a petition on March 31, 2025, asking the court to confirm an arbitration award against LabQ Clinical Diagnostics, LLC. The order states that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated as similar to a motion for summary judgment, which is a request for decision based on materials showing whether there is a genuine dispute requiring further proceedings.
Requirements and Deadlines
The court ordered Inovalon Provider to file and serve a statement under Local Civil Rule 56.1, along with any additional supporting materials, by April 25, 2025. The materials were to include the arbitration award, supporting documents, and affidavits or declarations stating that the exhibits are true and correct copies of what they claim to be.
LabQ was required to file its opposition by May 16, 2025. Inovalon Provider could file a reply by May 23, 2025.
The court also required Inovalon Provider to serve LabQ with the petition and order by April 9, 2025, through a person authorized under New York Civil Practice Law and Rules § 311. Inovalon Provider also had to serve the secretary of state under New York Business Corporation Law § 306 and file an affidavit proving service by April 11, 2025.
Disposition
Judge Analisa Torres issued an order setting briefing and service requirements. The order did not grant or deny the petition and did not decide whether the arbitration award should be confirmed.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.
Related cases
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund…Jul 2025
- Shashav. Malkin
- Trustees of the District Council No.9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund v…Jan 2025
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund…Jan 2025
- Manjarresv. Solar Mosaic
- PIRS Capitalv. Chen