Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 31, 2025

Friedeberg v. Rand McNally Corp.

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-09780
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Friedeberg v. Rand McNally Corp., Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

Donna L. Friedeberg’s action against Rand McNally Corp.; the judgment also affects any appeal by denying in forma pauperis status for that appeal.

What happened

In Friedeberg v. Rand McNally Corp., the court dismissed Donna L. Friedeberg’s action against Rand McNally Corp. The judgment says the dismissal was for reasons explained in a January 28, 2025, order, whose contents are not provided here.

The court also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied Friedeberg permission to appeal without paying the required filing fees.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain, Chief United States District Judge, signed the judgment on January 31, 2025. The available opinion does not explain the basis for dismissing the action.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Friedeberg v. Rand McNally Corp. · No. 1:24-cv-09780
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 31, 2025

Ruling

The court entered a civil judgment dismissing the action. It stated that the dismissal was based on reasons given in the court’s January 28, 2025, order. That earlier order is not included in the provided text, so the basis for dismissal cannot be determined from this opinion alone.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. As a result, it denied in forma pauperis status for an appeal, meaning the plaintiff could not appeal without paying the required filing fees under that status.

Effect

The action was dismissed, and appeal-related fee-waiver status was denied. The provided judgment does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.