Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 4, 2025

Jones v. Warden Carter of GRVC

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-00233
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Jones v. Warden Carter of GRVC was dismissed, and appeal-fee relief was denied; Judge Swain entered the judgment.

Who this affects

Rafael Arden Jones’s action was dismissed, and his ability to appeal without paying court fees was denied.

What happened

In Rafael Arden Jones v. Warden Carter of GRVC, the court entered a judgment dismissing the action. The judgment gives no additional facts about the claims or the reason for dismissal, instead referring to a February 3, 2025, order.

The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Jones permission to appeal without paying court fees. The judgment does not say whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment on February 4, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jones v. Warden Carter of GRVC · No. 1:25-cv-00233
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Feb. 4, 2025

Background

The opinion is a civil judgment in an action brought by Rafael Arden Jones against Warden Carter of GRVC. It does not describe the claims, the parties’ arguments, or the underlying facts.

Ruling

The court stated that, for the reasons given in its February 3, 2025, order, “this action is dismissed.” The February 3 order is not included in the provided text, so the basis for the dismissal cannot be determined here. The judgment does not state that the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to appeal without paying court fees. Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.