Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 5, 2025

Lewis v. The City of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-05822
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Robert Lewis v. City of New York, Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied IFP status for an appeal.

Who this affects

The judgment directly affected Robert Lewis and The City of New York. It dismissed the action and denied Robert Lewis permission to proceed without paying required fees for an appeal.

What happened

Robert Lewis sued the City of New York in an action identified as No. 23cv5822 (LTS). The judgment does not explain the underlying claims or the reasons for dismissal, instead referring to a February 3, 2025 order.

The court dismissed the action. It also determined that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying the required fees for an appeal.

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the February 5, 2025 judgment. The opinion provided does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lewis v. The City of New York · No. 1:23-cv-05822
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Feb. 5, 2025

Background

The provided document is a civil judgment in Robert Lewis’s action against The City of New York. It does not identify the claims, describe the parties’ arguments, or explain the reasons for dismissal. Instead, it incorporates the reasons stated in a February 3, 2025 order, which is not included here.

Ruling

The court dismissed the action. The judgment does not state whether the dismissal was with prejudice or without prejudice.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied in forma pauperis status—that is, permission to proceed without paying required court fees—for purposes of an appeal. The judgment cites a Supreme Court decision explaining that good faith exists when an appellant seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue.

Judge

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment on February 5, 2025, in New York, New York.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.