Murphy v. Araca Group GP, LLC
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:24-cv-09513
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Murphy v. Araca Group, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled-in-principle case without prejudice to timely restoration.
James Murphy, the people he sought to represent, and Araca Group GP, LLC; the case was closed subject to a timely application to restore it.
What happened
James Murphy brought Murphy v. Araca Group GP, LLC on behalf of himself and other similarly situated people. The court was told that the case had been settled in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either side. It allowed either side to seek restoration to the docket within 45 days and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.
Judge Ronnie Abrams also stated that any request for the court to retain authority to enforce a settlement had to place the agreement on the public record and receive the court’s approval within the period stated in the order. The order did not decide the underlying claims or state the settlement’s terms.
The detailed version
- Murphy v. Araca Group GP, LLC · No. 1:24-cv-09513
- Ronnie Abrams
- Feb. 5, 2025
Background
James Murphy filed this action on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated against Araca Group GP, LLC. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims. The court was informed that the case had been settled in principle.
Court’s Action
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s docket if an application to restore the action was made within 45 days. The court stated that any application to reopen filed after that period might be denied solely because it was late. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.
The court also stated that, if the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same thirty-day period stated in the order. The opinion does not provide the settlement terms or say that the court approved a settlement.
Disposition
Judge Ronnie Abrams discontinued the action without costs and without prejudice to a timely application to restore it. The order did not reach the merits of the underlying dispute.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.