Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 7, 2025

Garcia v. Otis Bantum Correctional Center

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-09665
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Garcia v. Otis Bantum Correctional Center, Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice after Garcia neither paid filing fees nor submitted required forms.

Who this affects

Jeffery Garcia's complaint was dismissed without prejudice because he did not submit the required filing forms or pay the $405 filing fee. His request to appeal without paying fees was also denied.

What happened

In Garcia v. Otis Bantum Correctional Center, Jeffery Garcia brought a civil case against Otis Bantum Correctional Center and others.

The court had ordered Garcia to submit forms requesting permission to proceed without paying the filing fee and authorizing deductions from his prisoner account, or to pay $405 in filing fees. Garcia did neither within the required thirty days.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice, meaning it was not permanently barred on this basis. The court also denied permission to appeal without paying fees and directed the clerk to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Garcia v. Otis Bantum Correctional Center · No. 1:24-cv-09665
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Feb. 7, 2025

Background

On December 20, 2024, the court ordered Jeffery Garcia to submit a completed application to proceed without paying the filing fee and a prisoner authorization, or to pay the $405 required to file a civil action. The order warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal.

Compliance and ruling

Garcia did not submit the required application and authorization and did not pay the filing fees. The court therefore dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915.

The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying fees. It directed the clerk to enter judgment in the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.