Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 13, 2025

Buxbaum v. TD Bank

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-10081
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

Judge Swain dismissed Buxbaum v. TD Bank without prejudice because it duplicated another pending case.

Who this affects

Michael Buxbaum’s duplicate lawsuit against TD Bank, N.A.; the dismissal did not bar pursuit of the related pending case identified by docket number 24-CV-09832 (KPF).

What happened

In Buxbaum v. TD Bank, Michael Buxbaum, representing himself, alleged that TD Bank did not carry out a wire transfer on December 18, 2024.

The court found that Buxbaum had already filed a substantially similar case against TD Bank, which was still pending under docket number 24-CV-09832 (KPF). Because the lawsuits involved the same defendant and were arguably related, the court said there was no useful purpose in litigating this duplicate case.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice to Buxbaum’s pending case. The court also denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees and directed the clerk to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Buxbaum v. TD Bank · No. 1:24-cv-10081
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 13, 2025

Background

Michael Buxbaum, who was representing himself, sued TD Bank, N.A. He alleged that TD Bank did not carry out a wire transfer on December 18, 2024.

Reason for Dismissal

The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice, meaning the dismissal did not bar the matter from being pursued in the related pending case. The court found that Buxbaum had previously filed a substantially similar complaint against TD Bank. That earlier case was pending under docket number 24-CV-09832 (KPF) before another judge of the same court. In that case, Buxbaum alleged that TD Bank refused to activate his debit card and sought to remove restrictions on his accounts. The court stated that the two cases involved the same defendant and were arguably related, so there was no useful purpose in litigating this duplicate lawsuit.

The court also noted a third lawsuit against TD Bank, docket number 25-CV-0224, involving allegations about a cashier’s check deposited into Buxbaum’s account and further instructions that TD Bank allegedly did not follow. The court stated that, to the extent claims in this action or the third lawsuit expanded on the claims in the pending earlier case, Buxbaum could amend the earlier complaint if the federal procedural rules allowed it.

Ruling

The court dismissed Buxbaum’s complaint without prejudice as duplicative of the complaint pending under docket number 24-CV-09832 (KPF). It certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees. The clerk was directed to enter judgment in this case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.