Charles v. Commissioner of Social Security
- Katharine Parker
- 1:24-cv-08535
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
Charles v. Commissioner of Social Security: Judge Parker reversed and remanded the Social Security decision for further proceedings and a new decision.
DANELCHARLES and the Commissioner of Social Security; the case returns to the Social Security Administration for further administrative proceedings and a new decision.
What happened
In Charles v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court entered judgment based on a stipulation and order dated February 13, 2025. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute or the reasons for the requested relief.
The court reversed and remanded the action to the Commissioner of Social Security under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Commissioner must conduct further administrative proceedings and issue a new decision.
The supplied case information identifies Judge Katharine Parker. The judgment is dated February 13, 2025, and was entered by the clerk on the court’s behalf.
The detailed version
- Charles v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:24-cv-08535
- Katharine Parker
- Feb. 13, 2025
Background
The opinion is a judgment in an action brought by DANELCHARLES against Michelle King, Acting Commissioner of Social Security. It states that the judgment follows the reasons given in a stipulation and order dated February 13, 2025, but that stipulation and order is not included in the provided text. The underlying claims and issues are therefore not described.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be reversed and remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). A sentence-four remand sends the case back for further administrative proceedings. The Commissioner must conduct those proceedings and issue a new decision. The judgment cites Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).
Effect
The judgment does not state what the new decision must conclude. It requires further administrative proceedings and a new decision by the Commissioner. The judgment was dated February 13, 2025, in New York, New York, and was entered by Clerk Tammi M. Hellwig through a deputy clerk.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.