Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 14, 2025

Chikhladze v. Government of Kingdom of Denmark

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-07741
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Chikhladze v. Government of Kingdom of Denmark, Judge Swain granted dismissal with prejudice and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

Who this affects

Simon Chikhladze, whose action was dismissed with prejudice, and the defendants named in the action.

What happened

In Chikhladze v. Government of Kingdom of Denmark, Simon Chikhladze told the court that he wanted to end the case voluntarily and permanently.

The court granted that request and dismissed the action with prejudice, meaning it cannot be brought again. The court also directed the clerk to terminate two pending motions.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Chikhladze v. Government of Kingdom of Denmark · No. 1:24-cv-07741
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Feb. 14, 2025

Background

On January 24, 2025, the court received Simon Chikhladze’s notice of voluntary dismissal. He asked to dismiss the action with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), which permits a plaintiff to voluntarily end an action in specified circumstances.

Ruling

The court granted Chikhladze’s request to dismiss the action with prejudice. It stated that the complaint was voluntarily dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). The court also directed the clerk to terminate the motions docketed at ECF 12 and ECF 14.

Appeal-related ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees. The opinion does not provide further information about the two terminated motions or the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.