Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 25, 2025

Buxbaum v. Experian

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-00404
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Buxbaum v. Experian, Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice because Buxbaum neither paid filing fees nor applied to proceed without them.

Who this affects

Michael Buxbaum's complaint was dismissed without prejudice, and he was denied permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal.

What happened

In Buxbaum v. Experian, the court had ordered Michael Buxbaum to submit an application to proceed without paying filing fees or pay the $405 filing fee within 30 days. The order warned that failing to do so would result in dismissal.

Buxbaum did neither. The court therefore dismissed the complaint without prejudice, meaning the dismissal did not bar refiling. The court also directed the clerk to enter judgment.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Buxbaum permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Buxbaum v. Experian · No. 1:25-cv-00404
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Feb. 25, 2025

Background

On January 21, 2025, the Court ordered Michael Buxbaum to submit a completed application to proceed without paying filing fees or to pay the $405 required to file a civil action. The order gave him 30 days and warned that the complaint would be dismissed if he did not comply.

Ruling

Buxbaum did not submit the application or pay the filing fees. The Court dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The Court also directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.

Appeal

The Court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to proceed without paying fees for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.