Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 3, 2025

Buxbaum v. Falco

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-00598
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Buxbaum v. Falco, Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied fee-waiver status for an appeal.

Who this affects

Michael Buxbaum’s action was dismissed, and he was denied permission to appeal without paying court fees.

What happened

Buxbaum v. Falco is a civil judgment dismissing Michael Buxbaum’s action against Louis Falco. The judgment gives no facts about the claims and refers to a February 27, 2025 order for the reasons.

The court also determined that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Buxbaum permission to appeal without paying the required fees.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment on March 3, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Buxbaum v. Falco · No. 1:25-cv-00598
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 3, 2025

Background

The opinion is a civil judgment in Michael Buxbaum’s action against Louis Falco. It does not describe the claims, the underlying events, or the reasoning for dismissal. Instead, it refers to the Court’s February 27, 2025 order, which is not included in the provided text.

Ruling

The Court dismissed the action. The judgment does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

The Court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. As a result, the Court denied permission to proceed without paying court fees for an appeal. The judgment cites Coppedge v. United States for the principle that good faith exists when an appellant seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue.

Disposition

The action was dismissed, and permission to appeal without paying court fees was denied. Because the provided judgment does not explain the basis for dismissal, the classification reflects that the court’s stated action does not reach the merits in the text provided.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.