Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 4, 2025

Buxbaum v. Coinbase, Inc.

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-00359
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Buxbaum v. Coinbase, Chief Judge Swain dismissed the action without prejudice because Buxbaum neither paid fees nor requested to proceed without paying.

Who this affects

Michael Buxbaum’s action against Coinbase, Inc.; the court also denied fee-free status for any appeal.

What happened

In Buxbaum v. Coinbase, Inc., the court had ordered Michael Buxbaum to submit a completed request to proceed without paying filing fees or pay the fees required to file a civil action.

Buxbaum did neither within the required 30 days. The court therefore dismissed the action without prejudice, meaning the dismissal did not permanently bar the action.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for any appeal. She directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment dismissing the action.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Buxbaum v. Coinbase, Inc. · No. 1:25-cv-00359
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 4, 2025

Background

On January 17, 2025, the court ordered Michael Buxbaum to submit a completed application to proceed without paying the filing fee or to pay the $405 required to file a civil action. The order stated that failing to comply would result in dismissal.

Court’s Analysis and Ruling

Buxbaum did not submit the application or pay the filing fee. The court dismissed the action without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

The court directed the Clerk of Court to enter a judgment dismissing the action for the reason stated in the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.