Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 4, 2025

Buxbaum v. Schroeder

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-00530
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Buxbaum v. Schroeder, Judge Swain dismissed the action without prejudice because Buxbaum neither paid filing fees nor submitted an IFP application.

Who this affects

Michael Buxbaum’s action was dismissed without prejudice because he did not submit the required application to proceed without paying filing fees or pay the $405 filing fee. His permission to proceed without paying fees on appeal was also denied.

What happened

In Buxbaum v. Schroeder, the court had ordered Michael Buxbaum to either submit an application to proceed without paying filing fees or pay the $405 required to file a civil case. The deadline was 30 days from the January 24, 2025 order.

Buxbaum did neither. The court therefore dismissed the action without prejudice, meaning the dismissal did not bar a new filing.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Buxbaum permission to proceed without paying appeal fees. She directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment dismissing the action.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Buxbaum v. Schroeder · No. 1:25-cv-00530
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 4, 2025

Background

On January 24, 2025, the court directed Plaintiff Michael Buxbaum, within 30 days, to either submit a completed application to proceed without paying the filing fees or pay the $405 in fees required to file a civil action. The order warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal.

Court’s Ruling

Buxbaum did not submit the application and did not pay the filing fees. The court dismissed the action without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The dismissal was based on the failure to comply with the court’s filing-fee directive, not on a decision about the underlying claims.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal and directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment dismissing the action.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.