Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 5, 2025

Ciccone v. John Doe 1 of NYS Police

Judge
Nelson Roman
Docket
7:25-cv-01669
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Ciccone v. John Doe #1, Judge Swain ordered the incarcerated plaintiff to pay fees or submit authorization within 30 days, or the action will be dismissed.

Who this affects

Nicholas V. Ciccone, an incarcerated plaintiff representing himself; the action will proceed only if he pays the fees or submits the required prisoner authorization within 30 days.

What happened

In Nicholas V. Ciccone v. John Doe #1 of NYS Police; et al., the incarcerated plaintiff filed a civil-rights case without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying fees upfront.

The court said Ciccone had submitted the fee-waiver application but not the required authorization allowing installment withdrawals from his prison account. The court gave him 30 days to pay $405 or submit the authorization; no summons will issue yet.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered that the case will be processed if Ciccone complies and will be dismissed if he does not. She also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ciccone v. John Doe 1 of NYS Police · No. 7:25-cv-01669
Judge
Nelson Roman
Date
Mar. 5, 2025

Background

Nicholas V. Ciccone filed this civil action while incarcerated at Otisville Correctional Facility. He is representing himself. He submitted an application to proceed without prepaying filing fees, but he did not submit the required prisoner authorization.

Court’s Order

The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $405 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee—or request permission to proceed without prepayment by submitting both an application and a prisoner authorization. If the court grants the fee-waiver application, the $350 filing fee must still be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. The authorization also directs the correctional facility to provide certified account statements for the previous six months.

The court ordered Ciccone, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $405 in fees or complete and submit the attached prisoner authorization labeled with docket number 1:25-CV-1669 (LTS). No summons will issue at this time. If Ciccone complies, the case will be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If he does not comply within the allowed period, the action will be dismissed.

Appeal and Other Warnings

Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order also cautioned that certain future dismissals could count as strikes under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, and that three such strikes generally prevent a prisoner from proceeding without prepaying fees unless an imminent-danger exception applies.

Classification

This is a procedural order concerning the filing-fee and prisoner-authorization requirements. It does not decide the merits of Ciccone’s claims against the defendants.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.