Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 24, 2025

Gross v. Applied UV, Inc.

Judge
Nelson Roman
Docket
7:25-cv-02237
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Gross v. Applied UV, Inc., Judge Swain ordered David S. Gross to pay fees or amend his request to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

David S. Gross must either pay the $405 in filing and administrative fees or submit an amended application to proceed without prepaying them; the case will be dismissed if he does neither within 30 days.

What happened

In Gross v. Applied UV, Inc., David S. Gross filed the case without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying court fees upfront.

The court found that his application did not show that he was unable to pay. He reported about $687 in monthly income, more than $19,000 in cash or bank accounts, and about $40,673 in brokerage and retirement accounts.

Judge Swain ordered Gross to pay $405 or submit an amended application within 30 days. No summons will issue yet, and the court said the case will be dismissed if he does not comply. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gross v. Applied UV, Inc. · No. 7:25-cv-02237
Judge
Nelson Roman
Date
Mar. 24, 2025

Background

David S. Gross brought this action without a lawyer and submitted an application to proceed without prepaying the filing fees, commonly called an IFP application. The court explained that a civil action requires payment of $405: a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee, unless the court authorizes proceeding without prepayment under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

The Court’s Analysis

The court found that Gross’s responses did not establish that he was unable to pay the fees. Gross reported that he was self-employed and earned approximately $687 per month. He stated that his parents paid his rent, that he had about $318 in monthly expenses, and that he had no dependents, debts, or financial obligations. He also reported approximately $19,100 in cash or checking and savings accounts, along with approximately $40,673 in brokerage and individual retirement accounts.

The court noted that his stated monthly expenses were less than half of his monthly income and that, even without considering the brokerage and retirement accounts, he appeared to have enough money to pay the filing fees.

Order

The court ordered Gross, within 30 days of March 24, 2025, either to pay the $405 in fees or to submit an amended IFP application addressing the deficiencies identified in the order and providing facts showing that he cannot pay. If the court grants the amended application, he may proceed without prepaying the fees.

No summons will issue at this time. If Gross complies, the case will be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If he does not comply within the permitted time, the action will be dismissed. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.