Purdy v. Bureau of Prisons
- Katherine Menendez
- 0:24-cv-04340
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In Purdy v. Bureau of Prisons, Judge Menendez adopted the report and recommendation and denied Purdy’s motion for a temporary restraining order.
Jeffrey Colin Purdy, whose motion for a temporary restraining order was denied; the order identifies the Bureau of Prisons and others as respondents.
What happened
Purdy v. Bureau of Prisons concerns Jeffrey Colin Purdy’s motion for a temporary restraining order. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute or the relief Purdy sought.
No one filed objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. The court therefore reviewed it for clear error, found no error, and adopted it.
The court denied Purdy’s motion. Judge Katherine M. Menendez signed the order on March 10, 2025.
The detailed version
- Purdy v. Bureau of Prisons · No. 0:24-cv-04340
- Katherine Menendez
- Mar. 10, 2025
Background
The order concerns Petitioner Jeffrey Colin Purdy’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, identified as ECF No. 8. The opinion does not explain the underlying claims or the specific temporary relief requested. The Bureau of Prisons and others are identified as respondents.
Review of the Report and Recommendation
United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation dated February 10, 2025. No objections were filed within the permitted period. Because there were no objections, the court reviewed the report and recommendation for clear error rather than conducting a fresh review of disputed issues. The court found no error and adopted the report and recommendation.
Ruling
The court denied Purdy’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Judge Katherine M. Menendez entered the order on March 10, 2025.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.